Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
november_5th: (Default)
My excitement to an upcoming event frequently fails to align with the reality of it.

I've read Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir 15 times in 2 years. Not a typo. The comforting Baritone of Ray Porter's voice as he reads me a lullaby of scientific experimentation and extraterrestrial friendships is *chef's kiss*. Love it.

Then the movie was announced. Oh my goodness. Others also saw the magnificence of that literature and were going to adapt it for the big screen? I get more Project Hail Mary in my life? Yes please! Sign me up!

I joined forums and commented on videos and posts. We had a community that was tracking the actors involved. I scoured James Ortiz's instagram posts for accidentally revealed production hints (of which there were many). And when it finally was introduced to theatres, I was the first to buy my tickets at the nearest IMAX, over an hour away. I pre-purchased a screen-accurate t-shirt that I saw in the trailers. I wore my Project Hail Mary pin. I was ready to drown myself in my love for this prose-turned-picture.

And then, I hated it. It was all wrong. When you have every word memorized, every intonation and character and rationale -- and then they change it?! Unacceptable. I almost threw my drink. It was wrong. They did it wrong.

My dear patient husband was subjected to my rant on the entire drive home. Did I mention the theatre was over an hour away?

I felt the same when the cast of Joss Whedon's Firefly was teasing a comeback. What? After so long? We are getting another season of Firefly? I almost dropped my drink in the restaurant when I saw the first post. For the next few weeks, I refreshed social media feeds frequently, anticipating the next post that would reveal hints of the secret they were holding. 

And then, the day came, and it was announced. Firefly, the animated series.

Oh.

Animated.

Huh.

I guess that makes sense.

And just like that, I haven't thought about it too much since.

Time and time again, my expectations fall short of reality. And it's a me-problem, not a them-problem. My appetite is insatiable, but also, specific.

And I'm not sure what to do with that information. I don't fully yet understand the implications of that on the rest of my life and behaviours, but surely there are some?

I must note the exception though: travel. Planning the trip is almost equally as enjoyable and exciting as the trip itself. But the trip itself has never disappointed. Go figure.

On writing.

May. 2nd, 2026 09:24 am
november_5th: (Default)
I miss it.

I miss writing.

I don't miss the spiraling.

Okay, that's not fully right. Not fully write.

It feels strange to look upon those times with any bit of nostalgia. Because I remember the mind swirling, the panic, the frantic typing to try to keep ahead of the screaming in my mind. Did I ever write about that screaming? I remember it well. I remember researching if it was something common -- something people commonly experienced and was just a normal thing. I remember reading about schitzophrenia and deciding that it didn't fit. I remember wondering if the voices in my mind offering up viscious castigation upon mineself were my own or if they were projected from elsewhere. If they were my own thoughts, why were they behaving that way? Why couldn't I control them? Why were they racing and treating me so poorly? Did I really hate myself that much?

And where was the screaming coming from?

To this day, I don't know if my brain was just projecting the torturous scream into my consciousness as a tangible echo of my feelings or if I was actually experiencing audible hallucinations. I couldn't tell the difference then, and retrospection doesn't add any clarity either.

I think a part of me still wants to save her. I think a part of me still thinks I can write her into safety. I think a part of me still wants to be seen and maybe my words will reach the eyes of someone who will connect with me.

But do I even need that anymore? Is that why I stopped writing? Is because I realized that it couldn't save me? Or is it because I saved myself and didn't need it anymore?

I saved myself.

I did.

This means truth is in the middle. The trauma from within stopped when it couldn't compete with the devastation caused by reality. Having been in a traumatic, abusive relationship, I stopped focusing on the past, and went into actual survival mode. It was no longer safe to write. Every piece of who I was was in fight or flight mode. When you are forced to delete old emails, have any piece of who you are examined harshly and judged and attacked by an external source, you stop putting yourself out there. You stop writing, because it isn't safe, because what if he finds it? It was too dangerous to write, to exist. Revealing any piece of who I was, offering it out to the universe, added more fuel to the fire. I wasn't willing to risk the parts of me he hadn't yet found and destroyed. So I held them close, protected them, hid them away so they couldn't be damaged.

And as awful as it was, I think it interrupted my own self-destructive patterns. I think it allowed me to choose to love myself, protect myself, stop fighting myself. Because you can't keep attacking yourself when you are already getting attacked.

So I stopped writing. Because writing wasn't safe. So I had to find other ways to cope.

And then I had my beautiful son. I'm not sure how to put it out in writing that I was blackmailed into keeping the pregnancy. That sounds so awful to put in writing. I think that's another part of it, actually. Writing is sharing truth, and the truth isn't always safe. The truth won't protect my son. And when you're initially raising him in an unsafe environment, your only goal becomes to protect him. So instead of trying to save myself, trying to save other broken people when I couldn't save myself, I sent my focus elsewhere, on protecting the person that I brought into this world.

And then, when we finally escaped that environment, for good, I was different. Traumatised, yes, but a different type of trauma. It wasn't the trauma of my teenage years. And when I escaped, I was free. Freer than I was even before it happened. When I was in an environment that wouldn't offer love, I had learned how to love myself. Seeking love from the outside wasn't an option, so I found love the only place that I could -- from within.

So what does writing offer me when I've found the healing I was seeking from it?

Am I still writing to be seen? Am I still writing to an unknown audience -- if you build it, they will come, style? I think, a bit, yes.

I think part of it is wanting all of me to be known. I think, while I no longer base my worth on how interesting and compelling I am, there's still parts of me that want to be interesting, to be compelling, to put myself out into the universe and have someone read it and go, oh, this rings true for me. Or oh, she's interesting. Or say, hey, I see you and I want you to write more so I can know more. 'I think you have value.' 'I think the world needs your words.' 'I connected to your words, so I connected to you.' 'Don't hide yourself.' 'You are exactly what the world needs, exactly as you are.'

But at the same time, why would I still need that from the universe? Is the instinct just leftovers from a long-held pattern of behaviour and desire from the before-time?

Because I have someone who doesn't need that of me. Who prefers me ordinary. Who refuses to be my audience, because he doesn't need me to perform. He just wants me to be. Not performing competence. Not performing intruigue. Not performing depth, or drama, and especially not performing pain. I don't need to be the wounded girl. I just need to be. And it's so freeing.

When we first started dating, I was pretty fresh out of the abusive relationship. I had a two year old. I fell for him because I thought he'd be safe to fall for. I thought he'd never be interested in me, because he'd never shown interest in anyone. Gay? Probably not. Asexual? More likely. Not interested? Almost definitely. But I saw in him kindness, patience, and a complete disconnect from the drama of others. He was beautiful in his simplicity. I think, at that point, I was finally drawn to the right thing. Trial-by-fire finally taught me how to love myself, and accept the right kind of love from someone else.

To my surprise and delight, he actually was interested in me. And his steady existance in my life without expectation was perfect, and confusing. He wasn't attracted to competence. Yes, he was impressed, and saw the value in it, but it was clear that it wasn't the motivating factor. Nor was he embedded in drama or intruigue. He just needed me to be me, whomever that was.

So, I had to figure that out. Who was I? When I loved myself, was loved by someone else, and didn't have to perform anything to keep that love, who was I?

He also didn't set boundaries on that. I could be the girl who liked going partying. I could be someone who liked hanging out with friends. I could be someone who liked reading, or crafts, or was extraverted, or intraverted. I could be someone who liked paddleboarding, or hiking, or writing, or gaming. I could be someone with drama, or with no drama. I could love travelling. I could have a messy house, or a clean house. I could have a messy mind, or a stable mind. And whatever definition of 'me' I finally landed on was okay. He would be there, happy to grow alongside me, or stay stagnant. We taught each other by watching each other. By being with him, I learned stability. I learned to be comfortable staying still. I learned that just 'being' was okay, and days without being exceptional was also okay. By being with me, his world expanded as I introduced him to travel, to striving for achievement, and allowed him to realize that he was also more capable than he knew and had more value than he realized.

He also had no interest in my past. Not in a bad way, as I initially assumed, but it was of no consequence to him. Whatever I had lived through was in the past had helped structure whatever I now was, but he wasn't an audience to it. He didn't need to hear about it. Didn't really have any fascination or interest in it. And at first, I didn't love that. After all, I was still at the point where it mattered. How could he truly see me if he didn't peek behind the curtain?

But, instead of activating that panic or spiral into disappointment, it actually did the opposite. His non-chalance and the lack of importance he put on needing to understand everything and apply meaning to everything and connect all the dots to figure out the bigger picture and how it was formed gave me permission to take it off the pedestal too. Oh. I can just be? Without investigation? Without crafting a symphony and epic of everything just to... to what? To prove that my life mattered?

If my life wasn't a sweeping epic, if my life wasn't worth writing about, would it still be worth living? Would it hold my interest?

I didn't want to be a boring person.

Let's be clear, I still don't want to be a boring person. But at this point, I think I've lived enough life that I can pause and just be. I can plan my next trip with my kids and get excited about it, without needing it to be lifechanging. I can go to work, and do a good job, and advance my skills and my career without needing it to be exceptional.

I can also be exceptional without needing others to recognize that. I can do it for myself.

Not always. Let's be honest, I'm not some monolith to myself who doesn't need the recognition from others. But now, the recognition doesn't need to be loud. It doesn't need to be constant. I don't need to have others gaze upon me and go 'wow'.

And I'm reading what I'm writing, and it all sounds so self-centred. Me, me, me. I know my writing has often been that way. And maybe that's another reason I've gone away from writing. I've turned my focus outward on other interests. I don't need to constantly self-examine or force meaning into something.

And I worry that makes me less intuitive, more dull, less exceptional. But maybe that's okay. Or maybe, the truth is that, hopefully instead, I'm less exhausting. And maybe I leave room for other people to be whomever they are, instead of casting them in the role of who I need them to be. When life isn't turned into an epic at every turn, it can just be lived.

People are coming over any minute for Dungeons and Dragons. I should probably wrap this up.

Maybe I will start writing again. And maybe I'll let that writing be whatever it is, without forcing it to have meaning or win a Pulitzer with every word.

Maybe the writing doesn't need to be scary, or wonderful. Maybe it can just be, and the meaning will follow, or it may have no meaning at all, and that's okay. Sometimes, getting words on a page can be okay by itself, without needing to construct perfect form. Like this. This writing meandered, and as writing often did, a lot of it came into existance as I wote, because it allowed me to process.

And I feel a sense of peace right now. And I remember this sense. This feeling where I took some time with myself to process the concepts that are below the surface. Maybe this is my meditation. I remember now why I used to write. It was for this. It was the way I expressed myself, even when no one was asking, even when no one was interested or talking to me or curious. And it allowed me to be allowed to exist in whatever form I existed in at that moment.

And yes, it often was chaos or spiral or over-the-top. But maybe, just maybe, it wasn't a performance. It was me. It was me being me, in a space where I could be. Seen, or unseen, it was at least there. And I think I had to put fingers to keyboard again, without interruption, without a plan, without a need to have a beginning, middle, and an end. Without the need to be beautifully structured prose that would connect with others and teach lessons.

I think I'm going to start writing again. Because I wrote this. And maybe this isn't bad. Maybe this can just be, as part of me, because it's a part that, honestly, I don't really think I need to lose anymore. As long as I'm not doing it for an audience. I can be my own audience. I don't need to perform. I don't need you to like this. I don't need any 'you' to exist. I genuinely don’t think anyone will read this. That's okay. That's actually better. Because, for once, that doesn’t feel like proof of anything. 

I can be my authentic self, because I'm not having to write to a figmented audience. The audience is me. And 'me' now accepts me for whomever I am.

So maybe I'll write more. Because I'd like to meet me.
november_5th: (Default)
I think I'm afraid to write again.

It's for many reasons.

On one hand, I'm afraid I don't have anything to say anymore. I'm afraid the words have run dry. I'm afraid I've become boring, plain, domestic. I'm afraid the creative mind has atrophied, leaving nought but particles of dust that were once dreams, ideas, fantasies, or myths.

On the other hand, I'm afraid the words are still there, along with the person who once bore them as weapons, as a shield, as a lifeline. Part of me wants to be the person for who words are no longer required, because the person who had the words readily at hand scares me. I'd like to think that I've moved on. I'd like to think that I've healed. But I'm afraid that I'm wrong. I'm afraid that I'll start writing prose and it will turn into the fractured monologues of a broken mind. As though it's the words that broke me, not the other way around. I can't help but notice the connection to how an addict feels about using. As if staying abstinent from my addiction is the only thing that will keep me stable. At the same time, an addict will miss it. They think: I'm okay now. I'm stable. I can control it. Just one hit. Just a little bit. Just to feel something again that's passionate, exhilarating, that makes everything mundane have meaning. Because even if it was terrible and heart wrenching and caused spirals to the depths of darkness far beyond the reach of any steady light source, it gave them something to hold onto. Because I found beauty in drowning myself.

And yet, it reminds me of the poem I once heard on a random PostSecret postcard that read:

Fuck the poets of the past, my friends.
there are no beautiful suicides.
just cold corpses with shit in their pants.
& the end of the gifts


I'm no longer seeking a beautiful suicide. I enjoy my beautiful life.

I just wonder if writing can be a part of that.
november_5th: (Default)
We know it's coming.

We don't know exactly what it is. But we can sense it. It's grown from whispers to thinly-veiled threats to outright outrage. They're not even trying to hide it anymore, whatever it is.

War? Revolution? Tyranny?

It's the hum of a high-voltage wire just before it snaps. The unnerving stillness in the air before the storm hits. It's not a single event we're afraid of, but the realization that the foundation we built our lives on has been eroding under our feet for years, and we're realizing the cracks in the floor have gotten dangerous.

It feels like that time alluded to in those dystopian novels I love. The flashbacks to an earlier time. The stories shared in backrooms by the elderly, clearly disclosing a history that they're not supposed to mention. We are in the before-time right now.

This "before-time" has a particular flavour. It’s a time of frantic, forced normalcy. We go to our jobs, we buy groceries, we discuss the weather, but there's a second, silent conversation happening underneath it all. It happens in the spaces between words, in the glances held a second too long, in the way we instinctively know which topics to avoid with which people. We are all performing a play of "everything is fine" for an audience that is also on stage, performing the same play.

We are rapidly losing ground. We are stumbling, plummeting down a gravelled hill, that just gets steeper and more unstable the further we go. We never realized that we were at the top. We never realized the steps we were taking were leading us down a path it was difficult to recover from.

When we realized, it was too late. The momentum was there. And there was no turning around.

So now, now we're here. Now we're staring down a barrell that clearly exposes that there's something dark and dangerous in the chamber. And it's only a matter of time before they notice and aim at us. In the meantime, they're conditioning us to ignore the splatter from the current targets.

The conditioning is the most insidious part. To make it palatable, the splatter is reframed. The first targets are always people on the fringes, the ones it's easy to label as "deserving." They are the "troublemakers", the "dissenters", the "unpatriotic". And the reasons given for their removal are always so 'reasonable', so logical. It’s for the sake of security. It’s for the common good. It’s to restore order.

Each time a new target is chosen, the circle of what is considered "acceptable" shrinks. The outrage is calibrated to be just manageable enough. It sparks, but it is contained. We tell ourselves that as long as we stay within the ever-narrowing lines, we will be safe. We don't realize we are living in a cage until we finally reach for the handle and find a lock.

We who feel this dread, we are the canaries in this coal mine. We are the ones who remember that the slope was once a plateau. And we are cursed to see the bottom of the hill while others are still complaining about the steepness of the path.

The barrel is there. The chamber is loaded. And the most terrifying part is that the ones holding the weapon don't even see us as people. We are simply the next variable to be eliminated in their equation of control. And we continue to watch the splatter, wondering when the droplets will have our name on them.

november_5th: (Default)

I asked ChatGPT to "please create an image of how you think I'll die."

For context, it was a Reddit prompt. ChatGPT then gave me two iterations of my death. One, based on its understanding of my trajectory as a teen. Then, when I prompted it again to give me one based on me, now, my current life, it gave me a different outcome.

I was not expecting just how in-your-face the image was for the first one.

In fact, I'm going to give a content warning for drug use.

( Content warning. [Image and explanation of death by OD] )

For context, I was never an addict, nor a user of strong drugs. I flirted with the idea of having something that could save me from the pain, from myself. I flirted with something that could take away the control that I held on to so tightly that I strangled it. I didn't want to lose my intelligence, but I also wanted to be tragic.

The idea that could have been my death is probably not far off from the truth. In another life, had I taken another path, yes. It's possible. If I finally gave into the narrative, and gave up, this could have been my ending.

So, the stark contrast to it's expectation about how it thought I might die now, following my current path, was not lost on me.

In contrast, the next image it gave me was not nearly so pain-filled.

( Minor content warning - Death )

 

I'm not ready to write out all my thoughts on this. But... I feel seen.

november_5th: (Default)

I fall into sociological rabbit holes more often than I mean to. Those “why is society like this?” thoughts that sneak up while I’m brushing my teeth or watching YouTube shorts. Little existential side quests.

This morning’s spiral started with considerations about police. I was considering how, a few years ago, someone severely dented my car while it was in a parking lot. I reported the incident to the police, and got the distinct impression that they weren't going to follow up. I ended up doing the legwork myself. I tracked down a security video showing the incident. I tracked down the man in the vehicle (had to do a little crowd-sourcing on social media, but found people who recognized him.) I researched the man and found his address, and then went there and found the truck. I went onto his property and took pictures of the truck, the license plate, the damage on his vehicle, which matched with what the video showed. I brought all the evidence to the police and they finally agreed to follow up. Nothing came of it. The guy claimed he 'didn't notice' (even though the video is very clear that he saw the damage he caused.) Thankfully, insurance would cover it, because I found the perpetrator. But if I hadn't, I would've been out of luck.

So, thinking of that event, my thoughts wandered into the ongoing dissonance between what people expect from policing and what actually plays out on the ground. I ended up wandering through some familiar territory: the social contract, legitimacy, institutional trust, systemic inequality, and the difference between what feels symbolic and what’s actually substantive.

Symbolic policing puts on a show: flashing lights, visible patrols, high-profile arrests that make the public feel like something’s being done. Substantive policing, on the other hand, means showing up for the boring stuff. It’s preventative. Investigative. It’s putting in the work even when there’s no spotlight.  But increasingly, what we get feels more like the illusion of safety over the reality of it.

And when institutions prioritize appearance over action, it reduces our trust in them. What's the point of bringing my legitimate harms to the police, if the police are just going to document that it happened, and forget about it? We surrender certain freedoms (vigilantism, vengence) in exchange for a promise: that the state will wield its power fairly, protectively. But when obvious harms go ignored, and justice becomes selective or performative, that social contract starts to feel more like a suggestion, and less legitimate.

It’s not just about power being used. It’s about who it’s used for, and who it’s used against.

And that got me thinking about something even closer to home. Not about institutions, but about me.

Because I do this too, in smaller, more intimate ways. I engage in symbolic behaviors. I show up for the conversations that feel exciting or affirming, but not always for the ones that are quiet, slow, or difficult to read.

I’ve started noticing how I instinctively gravitate toward certain people. It’s often the ones who match my tempo, who are quick with wit, who pass bacuriosity and insight with energy and clarity. People who play with ideas, who are emotionally agile but not reckless. People who give the impression that they “get it,” that they see something beneath the surface.

And even with some close friends, if I’m honest, part of me writes them off as less intuitive, less sharp, less interesting. I don’t always ascribe to them the full value they deserve, unless someone lights up my emotional radar. It’s not a conscious decision. But I notice it.

And that realization stings.

Because if I believe in nuance, if I value people for their substance, why do I so easily overlook the ones whose signals don’t match the frequencies I’m trained to notice?

Symbolic interactionism tells us that meaning isn’t fixed. It’s built in real time, through our interactions. And that includes how we assess people. Every time I nod politely and move on, or fail to circle back to someone’s insight, I help set the terms of who matters in that space. It’s not malicious. It’s patterned. It’s cultural. And it’s mine to unlearn.

Not all connections click. But the ones that don’t? I’ve sometimes labeled them as less meaningful, not because of who the person is, but because their energy didn’t mirror my own.

Maybe they speak too softly when I’m moving fast. Maybe they take longer to open up. Maybe they’re too vulnerable when I’m guarding my own tenderness. Maybe they're just too far ahead of my own development, or too far behind, and I move past them, not because they lacked value, but because their cues didn’t plug into my recognition system.

That’s on me.

Because emotional compatibility shouldn’t be the measure of someone’s worth. But in practice, it often becomes the gateway. And that’s a quieter kind of social exclusion, a redistribution of attention that mirrors the very inequities I claim to resist.

I'm starting to worry I've missed some of the most extraordinary people in my life, not because they weren’t compelling, but because their brilliance didn’t arrive in the packaging I was looking for. Maybe I’ve cast people as background characters because they didn’t amplify the story I was trying to live. And if I want to be someone who truly sees others, that means unlearning the scripts that taught me how to filter.

So I’ve been paying attention to the people I admire (especially Ali.) She's someone who who makes others feel heard, feel safe, feel valuable. She doesn't center herself, even though she easily could. These types of people are often brilliant, but they carry it lightly. They listen generously. They echo others’ ideas without needing credit. They distribute attention like it’s abundance, not currency. And I want to be more like that.

So now, I want to do it differently.

I want to stop trying to be exceptional, and start becoming someone who helps others feel exceptional. Not to center myself by association, but to quietly shift the balance of who gets to feel seen.

I want to be deliberate in how I show up. How I notice. How I hold space for the kind of brilliance that doesn’t always shine on cue.

Here’s how I’m going to try:

  • When someone says something and it gets ignored, I’ll loop back. “Hey, can we pause there? What you said was actually really thoughtful.”
  • When someone gets cut off mid-sentence, I’ll steer us back. “Wait, you didn’t get to finish, can we go back?”
  • When someone shares something vulnerable and it falls flat, I’ll name it. “That stuck with me. I just didn’t know how to respond in the moment.”
  • When someone says something wise in private, I’ll echo it in public. “You know, Lynda said something in a hallway chat last week that’s been echoing ever since...”
  • When I notice someone who’s always in the background but quietly brilliant, I’ll say it out loud.
  • When I see someone trying to belong in a room that wasn’t built for them, I’ll lean toward curiosity instead of comfort.

Because social capital gets built. Reinforced. Passed. And it can be redistributed. I can’t fix the whole system. But I can shift the weight of my own attention. And in a world where so many people feel invisible, strategic attention - real attention - might be one of the most radical things I have to offer.

And, to be fully transparent, I'm hoping that it can transform me. I'm hoping that it will lessen my own need to be seen as exceptional, and instead shift my need to be seen as someone who helps others feel exceptional.

Because, that's where the real value starts.

november_5th: (Default)
 I used to think I needed to shatter into something beautiful to be seen.

I desperately wanted to be seen.

So I threw metaphors to the void, wondering who would catch them, wondering who would respond, wondering who would take notice.

But, I also wanted to control how I was seen.

I curated versions of myself, polished just enough that if someone rejected me, I could pretend they had only rejected the performance. Not me. They just hadn't read between the lines well enough to see who I really was.


I've realized that I was afraid someone would look at me and see me as ordinary, or boring, or not worth their time. One of my deepest fears wasn't being disliked, it was that someone would see me, all of me, and feel nothing.

So, I layered performance, exaggeration, intensity, and intellect on top of a real, hurting self, because I believed the raw version wasn't enough to hold someone’s gaze. I had judged (and had no faith in) the world’s ability to want me anyway.


I thought I had to earn love and attention. I thought my value was in how smart I was or how much I could help others. When that failed, I leaned into being the tragic heroine. Because if you didn't like me, at least you wouldn't think I lacked depth.

And in return, I was dreadfully lonely.

I wasn't faking the pain. The hurting self was real. I felt more deeply than I knew what to do with. 

But I saw vulnerability as a flaw, not truth.

So I intellectualized my pain, crafted it into palatable stories. I wrote versions of myself that I could hold up like a mask, judging it and judging myself before anyone else could. If you thought I was too much, or not enough, I could just point to my writing and say, "Yeah? Tell me something I don't already know."

I turned vulnerability into performance. But performance, by its nature, creates distance. 

I was so desperate to be seen, but I wrapped myself in language so thick no one could reach me. And when they couldn't, or didn't do it in a way that I could write into the narrative of my life, I dismissed them. 

I know that people tried. But I never fully accepted their efforts.

I now see that I was hard to be close to.

There were reasons for that, some of them chemical, some psychological: the depression I kept trying to outsmart with metaphors, the ADHD I didn’t know I had, the panic attacks I called intensity, and the suicidal ideation that felt like both a threat and a comfort. But reasons aren't excuses. They don’t erase the impact.


It's taken me a long time to realize: I wasn't just hurting, I was careless with it. That's a painful insight to have now, because it was never my intention. 

I wanted connection, but I didn't make it easy. I had so little faith in my own value that I needed people to prove they wouldn't leave. But words weren't enough. So I set every bridge on fire, sometimes to keep people away, and sometimes just to see who would cross anyway.

I didn’t always carry my pain carefully. And expecting others to bear my burdens wasn't fair.


I also didn't treat everyone's attention equally. 

If I thought you were smart enough, complex enough, wounded enough — then your attention mattered. 

But if you seemed shallow, unremarkable, or uninteresting, then your words didn't count. 

Why? Because if someone whose lens I didn’t trust thought I was impressive, it didn’t feel like affirmation. It felt like confirmation of my worst fear: That I was only remarkable to the unremarkable.

Their praise didn't land because I didn’t believe it took much to earn it. And if it didn’t take much to earn, then maybe I wasn’t worth much after all.

It wasn’t really about them. It was about me. I was terrified that I’d only ever be admired by people whose standards I wouldn’t hold myself to.

But I turned that same scrutiny on myself.

My interests, my talents, my insights: they only counted if they met some impossible threshold. I kept striving for perfection, feeling if I was less than exceptional, others would also dismiss me in the same way.

I was a flawed person, depressed, erratic, and deeply trying not to be, but not ready to admit the things to myself that would actually have allowed me to improve.


I didn't know how to save myself. 

I thought if I was smart enough, I could fix it on my own. Admitting I needed help felt like admitting that I wasn't capable. Which would mean I wasn't as valuable as I needed to be, which meant not as worthy of love. 

So, instead, I turned my suffering into a script. 

I cast myself as the tragic lead. I handed supporting roles to people who never auditioned. They were real, but I didn't always relate to them as themselves, I related to the roles I needed them to play.

Don't get me wrong, I cared deeply. There were some people I entrusted my identity to. But I also used some people as mirrors, or metaphors. 

I also likely hurt some people who I treated as just footnotes. People who didn't make it into the story because they didn’t burn brightly enough, or their pain or depth didn’t echo loudly enough for me to notice.


Part of growing into a more whole version of myself isn’t just healing my wounds. It's seeing who I became while I was still bleeding.

And it’s being willing to say:

“Even though I was in pain, I caused pain. And not just to the people I loved, but to the ones I used as mirrors, placeholders, or props. I want to own that, not just explain it.”


I know I sometimes came off like I thought I was better than some people.

It wasn't arrogance. It was terror.

If I wasn't the smartest, most capable, most intuitive, most emotionally aware person (or sometimes, just the most broken) in the room... then who was I?

I clung to my intellect because I didn't think I had anything else worth offering.

The trauma, the writing, the razorblade nights, they’re all part of this subconscious contract I'd made with the world: 

“If I feel more, suffer more, think more deeply than others, then I must matter more.”


So I pushed “normal” people away. Not because they weren't enough, but because they didn't trigger my need to prove I was. 

It was safer to be unreadable than to risk being read and not valued.

I'd love to say that has completely changed. It hasn't. Not fully.

I still overidentify with competence more than warmth. I still sometimes measure my value by how useful or insightful I can be. But I'm learning. Slowly.


If you were someone I overlooked, dismissed, or quietly hurt while chasing meaning — or if you ever felt unseen because I didn’t ask, didn’t follow up, or stayed wrapped in my own story, I want you to know:

I see that now. I’m sorry. I wish I had shown up better.

You deserved more than what I gave you.

You were always more than a side character, even if I treated you like one. If you felt invisible, that was about my blindness, not your brightness.


That fear still lingers, the one that says unless I'm extraordinary in some way — brilliant, broken, or intense — I'll be forgettable.

I thought I had to earn love. That being loved wasn't a given, it was a prize for being remarkable. That my value was in how deeply I thought, how much I helped, how beautifully I suffered.

And I didn't just want to be loved. I needed to matter.

These days, I am still negotiating my worth. But the truth I'm learning is:

I don't need to be exceptional to be worthy.
I don't need to be effortless to be lovable.
I don't need to be palatable to be kept.

It still feels wrong. 

But I'm working on believing it.


But, it meant that when people left me, I saw it as a direct reflection of my value. 

I thought being fascinating would protect me from being abandoned. If I could make myself unforgettable, people wouldn’t leave. 

But I didn’t know how to be safe. Or consistent. I only knew how to be intense. 

And looking back, I can see how exhausting that must have been for the people who tried to love me. I blamed people for not loving me, when I couldn't love myself without bleeding.

That wasn't fair. 

I don’t think I knew how to be close without pain, or how to feel important without chaos. I didn't know how to love myself unless it hurt. Not unless I was bleeding. Not unless someone was leaving. Not unless I was proving. Not unless I was surviving. 

The idea that I could be calm, safe, happy (maybe even ordinary) and still be significant? It felt impossible. Because if I didn’t need to perform my value, how would anyone see it?

So instead, I built a soul so intricate, so vivid, so beautifully tragic, that peace felt like erasure. Stillness felt like death. Normalcy felt like exile. I didn't believe I got to be worthy without some sort of suffering contract attached.

And that put weight on people who were never meant to carry it.


I see the harm now, not just the hurt. 

Back then, I always thought of myself as the one who was wounded. But I wounded too. 

I didn't know how to check what I was projecting. And some people caught shrapnel from a war I was fighting with myself.

There was one person in particular who I bound my survival in. They never asked for that burden. They couldn't have carried it, even if they tried.


I thought love could drown me and save me, and god, I wanted it to. 

I never felt like I belonged anywhere. So I searched for proof that I was wanted. Needed. Desired. Valued. Chosen. Worth something.

But I made complexity a pre-requisite for intimacy. I confused intensity with meaning. And because of that, peace often felt like rejection. You can't build a stable life on that foundation. 

I was scared to build something lasting because deep down, I believed I would always ruin it. I would be too much. Too loud. Too weird. Too sharp. Too me.

And once that relationship finally broke, I did too. 


I had built my identity around being connected to him, around being seen by him.

I had assigned all my love, all my worth, to that relationship. So when he left, it didn't feel like a breakup. It felt like verdict.

Him leaving was internalized as evidence that I was inherently unlovable in my truest form. To me, it confirmed my worst fear: That I was always too much, or not enough.

His love had validated my existence. So his absence invalidated it. If I wasn't his person, his PosterGirl, then it meant becoming someone undefined. 

I had built my sense of self around being loved while broken. So when that love vanished, my brain grasped for safety and landed on this:

“I must have been too broken to keep.”

And that wasn't fair. Not to him. Not to me.

He didn't ask to be my reason for surviving. He didn't sign up to carry my identity or prove my worth.

I didn't know how to love someone maturely, responsibly, while keeping myself whole. We were young and unequipped to navigate it. But I didn't know that.

And when his love didn't complete me, I held onto it like it would. I gave him everything I had, hoping it would be reflected back as proof that I was enough. But he deserved better. And so did I. 

Now, with distance, I understand why he left. If I were him, I might’ve done the same. 

And I truly hope he's found a life where he's not needed to rescue anyone. A life where he's wanted just for being himself.


I used to think healing was just about understanding myself: mapping the pain, naming the patterns, explaining how I got here.

But healing isn’t complete until it accounts for its echo. Until it turns outward.

Because my pain didn’t exist in a vacuum. It leaked. It landed. It shaped people who didn’t ask to carry the fallout.

So this part isn’t about who I was to myself. It’s about who I became to others, especially when I was too consumed by surviving to see what I was costing them.


At the time, I used that grief as a shield. Holding on to him gave me a reason not to risk again, not fully.

I was flailing. I had lost the relationship that gave me meaning, so I desperately searched for something to fill that void.

I scoured the emotional wilderness for people who might reflect my own intensity, depth, and damage back to me in a way that felt like recognition.

I sought out those who were as broken as me, who loved as recklessly as me — who gave me a glimpse of a depth that might mean they could accept mine. 

And I tried to rescue them. Because, if I could save them, then maybe I could save myself. Or maybe, I wouldn't need to. 

Maybe it would be proof: that I was capable enough. Helpful enough. Loved enough. Smart enough. Worthy enough.

If I could love someone into wholeness, maybe there was hope for me.


Most of those connections, I still cherish. I didn't pity them, I resonated with them. 

Their trauma didn't repel me. It wasn't a warning sign; it was a shared language.

And sometimes, they let me be dangerous and delicate in the same breath. I found something holy in their brokenness.

But many of those relationships weren't about connection. They were experiments in reconstruction.

I was grieving in real time, testing who I could be in the aftermath. Trying on new mirrors to see if they reflected someone salvageable. 

I offered love to the parts of them that I couldn't love in myself: the displaced, the discarded, the deeply feeling. 

And I reached into their vulnerability behind the bravado, because I needed someone to do that for me.

Sometimes, those relationships awakened my sophistication. They tested my tolerance. And sometimes, they let me feel wanted in a way that felt elemental.


I kept learning the hard lesson that people don't heal just due to proximity to love. And neither do I. 

Those were the easier truths to admit.

Here's the harder one: I wasn't just drawn to wounded people because I understood pain. I was drawn to them because being needed was the closest I could get to feeling safe. 

I wanted their chaos. It let me be the emotional center without being seen as selfish. It let me offer care without risking rejection. It let me control the narrative by always being the stable one, even if I was broken too.

Because if they needed me, maybe they wouldn't leave me.

And truthfully, some of those relationships weren't connections. They were collisions. And I knew it. I walked into the fire anyway, telling myself it was passion.

I wasn't drawn to them because they matched my depth. I was with them because their instability distracted me from my own.

If I was managing their lives, I didn’t have to look at mine: Not the grief. Not the rage. Not the loneliness. Not the gaping void left behind when I lost the love I thought defined me.

Intensity became my identity. I became this gravity well for chaos, because I was trying not to disappear. Chaos, at least, proved I existed.


I didn’t always know how to be a friend without intensity. I didn't know how to be a friend, period. And I owe an apology to the people I hurt because of that. To the friends I overlooked while narrating my own story.

I thought I was being vulnerable: spilling truths, bleeding on the page, sending metaphors out like invitations. 

But I wasn’t really present. I didn’t ask about your days. I didn’t follow up. I didn’t notice when you were in pain, because I was too consumed by my own.

Some of you drifted. Some stayed longer than I probably deserved. Some are still in my life. And I imagine some still wonder if I ever truly saw them as more than supporting characters in my story.

If you were one of them: I’m sorry. You mattered. You still do.


At the time, I didn’t know.

I thought I was self-aware. I thought I was helping people. I thought I was seeking love, romance, connection. I thought I was doing the work.

But I wasn’t. Not really.

I was grasping, desperately, for anything that could resolve the emptiness I didn’t know how to name. Trying to prove I mattered because I didn't know how to believe it.

But if I couldn’t be whole, maybe I could be captivating. If I couldn’t be loved for being soft, maybe I could be admired for surviving sharp.

I wasn’t fully aware of any of that. I thought I was just intense. Passionate. I thought I was doing the work, and in some ways, I was. But I also missed a lot.

And that’s part of what I’m owning now, not just the actions, but the illusions I operated under while thinking I was doing everything right.


Even now, I second guess safety. I wonder if depth can exist without crisis.

When someone loves me without needing to be fixed, without me needing to bleed or burn for them, it feels suspicious.

At the same time, I still have this gnawing fear: That if I stop being different, stop being the one with the layered past and the scarred depth and the poetic lens, I'll vanish into ordinariness.

I'll just be someone’s wife, someone’s mom, someone’s friend… and disappear.

It's not true. Of course it's not.

But I built an entire identity around mastering the truth, around being the one who already knows. The one who sees all the patterns. The meaning behind it all.

But what I'd really been avoiding is being known in the absence of performance. To be known in the boring moments. In the silence. In the "nothing to explain" spaces.

Those are the scary spaces. ...I still fear I'm forgettable. 

I was a soul on fire. And it took me so long to learn how to live without burning everything to stay warm.


And this, this might be one of the hardest truths to sit with: I don’t need another epic. I need to grieve that my life isn’t going to be one.

That's the difference in my current relationship. It didn't start with "Who do I need to save?" It began with "What does love look like when no one has to bleed for it?"

And that's it.

I no longer expect perfection from others. 

I no longer measure flaws for evidence that someone is unqualified to validate me.

I no longer test love by making people walk through fire to reach me.

And I no longer present myself as something fleeting they might lose.


So here's what I know now:

  • I often confused being compelling with being loved.
  • I confused visibility with intimacy.
  • I sometimes hurt people while trying to heal them.
  • I needed to be exceptional because "ordinary" felt like "disposable."
  • I thought the most interesting version of me was the only lovable one.
  • I didn’t trust that the quiet version could ever be enough.
  • Impact became my measure for worth, even when it had a cost.
  • I asked too much of myself and of others without understanding the consequences.

I’m not writing this because I’m healed. I’m writing this because I’m trying to be accountable.

This isn’t a victory lap. It’s a reckoning. I still get scared. I still overthink.

But I don’t confuse chaos with connection anymore.

And I don’t think I need to shatter to be seen.

november_5th: (Default)

I miss my friends.

I've been coming to terms with the idea that my version of friendship vastly differs from other peoples'. I always just considered myself a low-maintenance friend. But what that means is that once we're friends, that's it. No questions. No reevaluation unless you tell me we are no longer friends, or you do something undeniably and purposefully cruel to me.

You can show up on my doorstep or in my messages or give me a call and I won't question it. If you need a ride to the airport or a pet sitter or just someone to connect with, my friends can hit me up. It doesn't matter if it's been 2 days, 2 months, 2 years or 20 years. I will be thrilled to see you.

But I'm learning that's not reality for most people. And y'all may think I'm daft, but I don't think I ever really realized how pervasive the alternative concept of friendship is. This is going to seem really obvious when I type is out (so you're going to have to take my word that it wasn't obvious to me), but I didn't realize that most people think that if your friends aren't actively checking in with you, then they've abandoned you and you aren't friends anymore.

I run hot and focused. Which is ironic, because I have ADHD and my feet are always cold. But what I mean is that if I'm paying attention to someone, I will often give them all my energy, all my love, all my support. Or, I put all my effort into my work, or school, or kids, or hobby. Everything I do gets my 100%. But it drains me, and it means I don't have much time or energy or recognition left over to do the maintenance work - the check-ins, the regular updates on the mundane life stuff, the day-to-day communications that apparently define most friendships.

And because I had the assumption that we're always going to remain friends, I've been blindsided more than once when people accuse me of abandoning them, or rejecting them, or leaving them. Meanwhile, I'm blissfully unaware that they're feeling that way until the bomb is dropped that they're not going to be friends anymore. I wasn't MIA because I stopped caring. I was just trusting that the bond didn’t need proof to remain real. I assumed we were all just living our lives and we would circle back together, because I love you for who you are, not how much energy you offer to me. And I wish I could say that when I'm written off, I move on. But I don't. I still love them.

I still love Jas. And Megan. And Jess. And Fabian. And Tyler. And Shaundra. And Mike. And Jordan. And Brandon. And Mikayla. And all the people who just wrote me off because they thought I'd already written them off, or thought... something. You're still in my thoughts. I still cherish the memories we have together. I still wonder what you're up to and wish it was easy to check up on you. But my check-in timelines are never aligned with others', and it's left me with just the friends who run on the same timeline as me.

I'm very grateful for Corey, Ocean, Robyn, Alyssa, and all the friends who are equally content with living full lives and then circling back around to connect, update each other, and create more memories together.

Honestly, I miss the days where people had MSN statuses that I could look at and get a sense of how they were doing. I miss the days of livejournal, where people could pour our their souls en masse and it was so much easier to reach out to more people at a time. Yes, I know Facebook and Instagram exists, but it's not the same. Soul bearing on Facebook comes with so much ick when you've got ex colleagues and extended family and old aquaintences on there. It seems so much more impersonal, or curated, on Facebook.

I remember that Livi, Megan and I used to pass around a journal in high school. We'd update it, then pass it to the next person. It was communication, comraderie, connection. I remember La Vie Posse, where we would update a shared livejournal. And now? Life is busy. I don't have the energy or flexibility to meet up with people as easily, or even just hold conversations. Having two kids, a full time job, a husband, a life, it gets complex and restricting.

I miss the freedom of being able to see my people every day. I miss having those meet up places. I miss my friends. I miss it all (okay, maybe I don't miss the emotional exorcism that I went through on the regular -- life is definitely calmer now).

I sometimes wonder if they miss me, too.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

♪♫ I missed the grinding concrete where we sat past 8 or 9
And slowly finished laughing in the glow of our headlights
I've given a lot of thought to the nights we used to have
The days have come and gone, our lives went by so fast
I faintly remember breathing on your bedroom floor
Where I laid and told you, but you swear you loved me more

Do you care if I don't know what to say?
Will you sleep tonight? Will you think of me? 
♫♪

Profile

november_5th: (Default)
november_5th

May 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2
34 56789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Sep. 26th, 2026 09:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios